Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Burnell v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Joe Baby Burnell
Defendant:
W. Montgomery, Ali Hasan, B. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinckney v. Duncan et al
as 6:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Pinckney
Defendant:
Stephen Duncan, Timothy Burnell, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Earl v. Goodwin
as 22-30640
Petitioner / Appellant:
Burnell Earl
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Santiago v. Burnelle et al
as 3:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
Herb Miller Santiago
Defendant:
Burnelle and New Haven Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl v. Goodwin et al
as 2:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Burnell Earl
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaCroix v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Defendant:
DeAngelo Dove, Christopher Erwing, Brandon French and others
Plaintiff:
Terry LaCroix and Terry Lynn LaCroix
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnell v. Wilson
as 2:2021cv00391
Petitioner:
Jamal Dontae Burnell
Respondent:
R. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alexander v. Goforth et al
as 4:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Dexter Pyane, Marshall Dale Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Plaintiff:
William Burnell Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Lt. Burnel, Colette Peters, Sgt. French and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney S. Orr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
