Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Giles et al v. Tregre et al
as 2:2026cv01602
Plaintiff:
Lewis Giles, Jr., Lewis Giles, III, Sherika K Giles and others
Defendant:
Michael Kerry Tregre, Michael D'Amato, Wilfred Mitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cannon v. Pate et al
as 5:2026ct03210
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cannon
Defendant:
Imelda Pate, Kimberly Benton, Ryan Herrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Causey v. Harouff et al
as 4:2026cv02824
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Causey
Defendant:
Daniel Harouff, Curtis Earley, Brent Blakeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wagner v. Brown et al
as 3:2026cv00951
Plaintiff:
John A. Wagner
Defendant:
Jeremiah Brown, Latoya Hughes, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Gothe et al
as 3:2026cv01797
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lavon Lee, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Gothe, Marcus Holley, Jim Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Cunningham
as 26-12404
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JODALE CUNNINGHAM
Ritz v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sherie Ritz
Defendant:
Fentress County, Tennessee, Hunter Fowler, Michael Reagon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Cunningham
as 26-12396
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JODALE CUNNINGHAM
GRAHAM v. HOLLINBAUGH et al
as 3:2026cv01315
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LEE GRAHAM
Defendant:
KEN HOLLINBAUGH, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and (JANE DOE) CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
