Cases 1 - 10 of 1,829
Dunahue v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00155
Defendant:
Micheal Richardson, William Straughn, C Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Straughn et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Ellis
Defendant:
C Smith, Roosevelt Barden, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackheart v. Harrison et al
as 7:2024cv00505
Defendant:
C. Smith, Inv. Cole, Inv. Squirer and others
Plaintiff:
Raven Blackheart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EPPS v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv08053
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 and JAY C SMITH
Plaintiff:
JULIE EPPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Smith #370127 v. Skinner
as 2:2024cv01800
Petitioner:
Cary C Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Russell Skinner and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saddozai v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4305
Defendant:
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison, CLAWSON, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison, HERRERA, Sergeant Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Hayes v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv04249
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hayes
Defendant:
Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman, Enphase Energy, Inc. and Mandy Yang
Petitioner:
Andrey Ponomarchuk, Michael Gastonguay, Daniel C. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Smith, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00859
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Cairo
as 2:2024cv01590
Plaintiff:
Cary C Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Sunita Cairo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00236
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, Phillip C Smith, Jr and Raquel West
Plaintiff:
Marthur L Dingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
