Cases 1 - 10 of 93
USA v. Washington
as 24-30174
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ladarrell C. Washington
Michael Collins v. J. Oats
as 24-6126
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASHARN COLLINS
Defendant:
J. D. OATS, Assistant Warden, C. WASHINGTON, Inmate Program Manager and BERNARD MORRIS, Religious Advisor to the Faith Review Committee for Virginia DOC
Eric Martin v. Ryan Sass, et al
as 24-1025
Plaintiff:
ERIC MARTIN
Defendant:
RYAN SASS, Michigan State Police Officer, ROBERT HERRST, Michigan State Police Officer, MIKE [UNKNOWN], Manager at Sakstrups Towing and others
Martin v. Sass et al
as 2:2023cv12741
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin
Defendant:
Ryan Sass, Robert Herrst, Mike LNU and others
Washington v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv02754
Plaintiff:
Richard C Washington
Defendant:
T Wolfe, Stephawn Tate, Matthew Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Gib Lewis Prison Unit et al
as 4:2023cv02964
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal
Defendant:
Gib Lewis Prison Unit, Warden Perez, Assistant Warden C. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01455
Plaintiff:
Maurice C. Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
McNeal v. Perez et al
as 4:2023cv02608
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dewayne McNeal
Defendant:
Perez, C. Washington, A. McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
