Cases 21 - 30 of 14,177
Marroquin v. Crosby Dredging, LLC
as 4:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARROQUIN
Defendant:
CROSBY DREDGING, LLC
Material Witne:
Texas Ortho Spine Center
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 883 Jones Act
AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS v. ZAMANILLO et al
as 1:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS
Defendant:
JORGE ZAMANILLO and CROSBY KEMPER
Amicus Curiae:
AFRO LATINO FORUM, ASPIRA ASSOCIATION and HISPANIC FEDERATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CROSBY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
J. KALLIS, OFFICER JANE DOE, SAJNAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Griffin v. Christian et al
as 8:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Andy Griffin
Defendant:
Micheal Christian, N. Stotler, R. Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Crosby
as 24-3018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Crosby v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Fielding Stanley Crosby
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Kristi Hamet v. Alesia Doreen Hamlet et al
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kristi Hamet
Defendant:
Alesia Doreen Hamlet, Michael Izel Crosby and Jack Earl Crosby
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
