Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Weaver v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv01652
Plaintiff:
Calvin Edward Weaver
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Comstock, Kwabena Owosu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Ramirez
as 1:2017cv01663
Petitioner:
Calvin Edwards
Respondent:
Gio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooksey v. Simmon
as 16-3519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin Edward Cooksey, in his individual capacity as biological father parent of Christopher Edwind Cooksey, who is also known as Lonny Breaux, Christopher Lonny Breaux, and legal name (allegedly) Christopher Francis Ocean, Frank Ocean
Defendant - Appellee:
Global Grind Digital, a corporation
Defendant:
Russell Wendell Simmons, in his individual and professioonal capacity as Editor and Chief of Global Grind Digital, Brittany Lewis, in her individual and professional capacity as Global Grind Digital, internet news reported, Accel Partners, a corporation and associate partner with Global Grind Digital and others
Edwards v. United States of America
as 6:2016cv01161
Petitioner:
Calvin Edwards
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Calvin Miller
as 16-6734
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN EDWARD MILLER, a/k/a Killer, a/k/a Calvin Elwood Miller
Cooksey v. Global Grind Digital
as 1:2015cv07418
Plaintiff:
Calvin Edward Cooksey
Defendant:
Global Grind Digital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. CO JOHN DOE et al
as 3:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
CALVIN EDWARDS
Defendant:
CO JOHN DOE, VINCENT DEFELICE, LT. SHEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Calvin Batiste, Jr.
as 15-30160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN EDWARD BATISTE, JR.
Batiste v. USA
as 2:2014cv02296
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Calvin Edward Batiste, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
