Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Donaghe v. Lashway et al
as 3:2016cv05973
Plaintiff:
Sam Donaghe
Defendant:
Patrisha Lashway, Kevin Quigley, John Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bettys v. Lashaway et al
as 3:2016cv05626
Plaintiff:
John E Bettys
Defendant:
Patricia Lashaway , John Clayton , William VanHook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold et al v. Welch et al
as 2:2016cv01359
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Arnold and Hope Yarboro
Defendant:
William Welch, Elaine Robinson, E Grisset and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turay v. Quigley et al
as 3:2016cv05190
Plaintiff:
Richard G Turay
Defendant:
Kevin Quigley, John Clayton, Mark Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Houston Independent School District
as 4:2015cv01395
Plaintiff:
Darryl Adams , Leslie Adams , Claudette Berry and others
Defendant:
Houston Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Charles M. Forman v. Scott
as 0:2014mc62555
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Forman
Defendant:
Carol Scott
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Scott v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv20449
Plaintiff:
Carol Scott
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Cook Group, Inc., Cook Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-20449
Plaintiff:
Carol Scott
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Cook Group, Inc., Cook Incorporated and others
Scott v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc
as 2:2013cv00719
Plaintiff:
Carol Scott
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Scott v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc
as 3:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Carol Scott
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Tennessee, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
