Cases 11 - 20 of 2,378
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Clark v. Weiser et al
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, India Kidd-Aaron, Patty Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Channing Booth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sessions et al v. Chan-A-Sue
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Karey Sessions
Defendant:
Brian Chan-A-Sue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dorsey v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01410
Plaintiff:
Julius Dorsey
Defendant:
Russell W. Smith and Chan B. Caudell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkinson v. McFalls et al
as 0:2024cv01545
Plaintiff:
Todd Atkinson
Defendant:
Justin L. McFalls, Reardon McFalls Enterprises, LLC and Chan Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Chan v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jenny Chan
Defendant:
Target Corporation and Miriam Albrecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KITCHEN v. CHAN et al
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY KITCHEN
Defendant:
ELBERT CHAN, 7248 ADULT DAY CARE, INC. doing business as ASSURED CARE CENTER DAYCARE and 7248 HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jeannite v. Melendez et al
as 1:2024cv10698
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Christopher Melendez, Brian Gravel, Anthony Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
