Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kevin Gregory v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6168
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE GREGORY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and ROY CHEATAM, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KNOX v. CHEATAM et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
KEVERY KRISTOPHER KNOX
Defendant:
CHEATAM, T. BARNHART and J. SAJNAJ SAJNAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gregory v. Cheatam
as 2:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Kevin Lee Gregory
Respondent:
Mr. Carlton, District Attorney of Stafford County and Roy Cheatam, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Greene v. Sheriff, Richmond County Jail
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Brandon Greene
Defendant:
Sheriff, Richmond County Jail, Lt. M. Cheatam, SGT. N. Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jeffery Grimes v. Roy Cheatam, et al
as 22-2128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY CHEATAM, WARDEN CIOLLI, UNIT TEAM MANAGER KNIKS and others
Alex Lege v. City of Ketchikan, et al
as 22-35029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX J. LEGE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF KETCHIKAN, a municipal corporation, ROBERT CHEATAM, in his individual capacity, JUSTIN OSTLER, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHEATAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03101
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE CHEATAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
