Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Acuna et al v. Pipefitters Local No. 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund Plan et al
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACUNA, DANIEL ARMSTRONG, DOUGLAS BARDY and others
Defendant:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND PLAN, Carl Evans, CHRIS FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GIBSON v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Petitioner:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Respondent:
CHRIS FREEMAN, ERICA BRENDON, JASON RAMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ormiston et al v. Freeman et al
as 1:2021cv04654
Plaintiff:
Robert Ormiston and Elizabeth Giordano
Defendant:
Julie Freeman and Chris Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRANK M. GARGIULO & SON, INC. v. B. GOOD INTERNATIONAL, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv18200
Defendant:
B. GOOD INTERNATIONAL, LLC, B GOOD MASTER, LLC, ANTHONY ACKIL and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK M. GARGIULO & SON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
FREEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88634
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galbraith et al v. Construction Unlimited LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00363
Defendant:
Chris Freeman, Construction Unlimited LLC and Salvatore Cataido
Plaintiff:
Liza Arceo and Joshua Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ibarra v. Hoffman
as 4:2019cv02623
Defendant:
Hoffman, Keith Mensing, Chris Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lugo Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Freeman et al
as 3:2014cv01827
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Duncan
Defendant:
James Chris Freeman , Erin Freeman and Good Vapes LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
