Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Johnson v. Dukes et al
as 4:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Johnson
Defendant:
Dukes, Martin, Dorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley D. Sharp v. Duff and Phelps, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv08069
Receiver:
Permanent Receiver Bradley D. Sharp
Defendant:
Duff & Phelps, LLC and Duff and Phelps, LLC
Plaintiff:
Bradley D. Sharp and Christopher D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71322
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87408
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Dillard
as 2:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Johnson
Defendant:
Dillard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis
as 1:2017cv00679
Defendant:
Lorie Davis - Director of the TDCJ-Correctional Institutions Division
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Johnson
Respondent:
Director Jonim White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Johnson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Jefferson Dunn, Joseph Wombles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00749
Petitioner:
Christopher D Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHNSON
as 1:2013mc00048
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER D. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Bank of America Corporation
as 1:2010cv03853
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Johnson
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
