Cases 1 - 10 of 447
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
Johnson, Christopher v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2024cv60313
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
D. McKenzie, Valdez, Eugene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ennis-White et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Rusty Ennis-White and Jonathon Ennis-White
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Christopher Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emmett Brock et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 8:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
EMMETT BROCK
Petitioner:
SGT RAYMOND MUNOZ, SGT JEREMIAH FLETCHER and CMDR ALLEN CASTELLANO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JOSEPH BENZA III, CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thrift v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Sean Alan Thrift
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, Tyrone Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Wilson v. Brandon Robinson, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Defendant:
BRANDON ROBINSON, BRIAN DAVID GOULDY, DERRICK DAUGHERTY and others
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Sternell Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
