Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robinson v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv01200
Petitioner:
Clinton Robinson
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN EDWARD WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cardinale v. Becerra et al
as 2:2020at00651
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Scott R. Jones, Clinton Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Connie A. Cardinale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardinale v. Becerra et al
as 2:2020cv01325
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Scott R. Jones, Clinton Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Connie A. Cardinale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv20113
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CLINTON ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2019cv06672
Defendant:
Kent D. Hook, COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, Thomas J. Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. USA
as 2:2019cv00144
Petitioner:
CLINTON ROBINSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson v. Jumpstart Consultants, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Clinton Robinson
Defendant:
Jumpstart Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fitts et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00614
Plaintiff:
Monica Fitts , M. F. , Amber Adams and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , GlaxoSmithKline and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Butler v. Chasity Jackson, et al
as 15-1392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Andre Butler
Plaintiff:
Derick Stevenson and Clinton Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Chasity Jackson, Tracy Reece, Loren Devine and others
Butler v. Does
as 3:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Mark A Butler, Derick Stevenson and Clinton Robinson
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
