Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Compton Unified School District v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10159
Plaintiff:
Compton Unified School District
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Compton v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2026cv02580
Plaintiff:
Robert Compton
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
COMPTON v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2026cv00903
Petitioner:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Campbell v. Compton et al
as 2:2026cv02733
Plaintiff:
Latosha L. Campbell
Defendant:
Katherin Compton, Daniel Jenkins, Behnaz F. Salimian-Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Compton v. Casker et al
as 7:2026cv00663
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Compton, Jr.
Respondent:
Gregory T. Casker and Bryan Haskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Compton v. Casker et al
as 3:2026cv00802
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregory T. Casker and Bryan Haskin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Casker
as 7:2026cv00634
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Compton, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregory T. Casker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.