Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Approximately $483,054.11 from Putnam County Bank Account Number Ending in 8577
as 3:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $483,054.11 from Putnam County Bank Account Number Ending in 8577
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(c) Forfeiture of Proceeds for Identity Theft
Converse County Bank v. U.S. Small Business Administration, et al
as 26-8011
Plaintiff:
CONVERSE COUNTY BANK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ISABEL CASILLAS GUZMAN, in her official capacity as administrator of the United States Small Business Administration
Shipp v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2026cv00284
Defendant:
M&T Bank, State of Connecticut, Robert A. Maresca and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Troy Shipp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Matthew Jones v. Discover Bank, et al
as 25-1657
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
DISCOVER BANK, CITIZENS BANK, M&T BANK and others
Jones v. Discover Bank et al
as 1:2025cv00310
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Discover Bank, Citizens Bank, M & T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Discover Bank, et al
as 25-1298
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
DISCOVER BANK, CITIZENS BANK, M&T BANK and others
Jones v. Discover Bank et al
as 1:2024cv01415
Defendant:
Liberty Gas, Cafe' DiLeo's, Brooks Armored Car Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01481
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank
as 2:2024cv01823
Defendant:
Tri-Counties Bank
Plaintiff:
Mary Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
