Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Courthouse News Service v. Allen et al
as 1:2026cv04837
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Greg G. Allen, Patty Baker, Danielle F. Forte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Courthouse News Service v. Edward Jewett
as 26-2043
Plaintiff:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, LEE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED and LEE BHM, LLC, Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Roanoke Times, Bristol Herald Courier, Lynchburg News and Advance, Fredericksburg Freelance Star and The Daily Progress
Defendant:
EDWARD JEWETT, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, BRENDA HAMILTON, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia and KELLY FLANNAGAN, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Bristol, Virginia
Edward Jewett v. Courthouse News Service
as 26-199
Petitioner:
EDWARD JEWETT, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, BRENDA HAMILTON, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia and KELLY FLANNAGAN, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Bristol, Virginia
Respondent:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, LEE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED and LEE BHM, LLC, Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Roanoke Times, Bristol Herald Courier, Lynchburg News and Advance, Fredericksburg Freelance Star and The Daily Progress
Courthouse News Service v. Karl Hade
as 26-1694
Plaintiff:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, LEE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED and LEE BHM, LLC, Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Roanoke Times, Bristol Herald Courier, Lynchburg News and Advance, Fredericksburg Freelance Star and The Daily Progress
Defendant:
KARL R. HADE, in his official capacity as Executive Secretary of the Office of Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia, EDWARD JEWETT, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, Virginia, BRENDA HAMILTON, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia and others
Courthouse News Service v. Edward Jewett
as 26-1648
Plaintiff:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE, LEE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED and LEE BHM, LLC, Publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, The Roanoke Times, Bristol Herald Courier, Lynchburg News and Advance, Fredericksburg Freelance Star and The Daily Progress
Defendant:
BRENDA HAMILTON, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Roanoke, Virginia, KELLY FLANNAGAN, in her official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit Court for the City of Bristol, Virginia, KARL R. HADE, in his official capacity as Executive Secretary of the Office of Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of Virginia and others
Courthouse News Service et al v. Hade et al
as 1:2025cv00075
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service, Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and Lee BHM, LLC
Defendant:
Karl R. Hade, Edward Jewett, Brenda Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Bevington et al.
as 1:2025cv02617
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Sheila Bevington and Carl DiFranco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Los Angeles Press Club, et al. v. Noem, et al.
as 25-5975
Plaintiff:
LOS ANGELES PRESS CLUB, NEWSGUILD - COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, SEAN BECKNER-CARMITCHEL and others
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Courthouse News Service v. Ramsey
as 3:2025cv00044
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Zachary Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Russell et al
as 2:2025cv00789
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Candy S. Russell, Shawn Peeples and Breighton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
