Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Christopher Mahon v. Kilgore
as 19-6369
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER DYE, Co., A. DYE, JOSHUA HESS, Co. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RYAN MAHON
KIMMELL v. ENOVAPREMIER OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00070
Defendant:
ENOVAPREMIER OF INDIANA LLC and GUSTAVO JIMENEZ, INC.
Plaintiff:
TROY D. KIMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor #161123 v. Kimmel
as 1:2017cv01084
Plaintiff:
Leon Taylor #161123
Defendant:
D. Kimmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILLAN AND HARTMANN, INC. v. KIMMEL BOGRETTE ARCHITECTURE + SITE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
GILLAN AND HARTMANN, INC.
Defendant:
KIMMEL BOGRETTE ARCHITECTURE + SITE, INC. , MARTIN D. KIMMEL and MONTGOMERY COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jackie C. Knott et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv20494
Plaintiff:
Jackie C. Knott , Timothy W. Knott , Nelda A. Turnbo and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackie C. Knott et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv07921
Plaintiff:
Disheeka Barrett, Pierre Brailsford, Jeigh Carstarphen and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Kimmell v. Obama et al
as 1:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
James D. Kimmell
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, George Walker Bush, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimmel v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2009cv04052
Plaintiff:
Robin D. Kimmel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Neal v. Frankowitz et al
as 0:2008cv60812
Plaintiff:
Ward Neal
Defendant:
Stanley Frankowitz and Richard D. Kimmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
