Cases 1 - 10 of 100
ASHLEY et al v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv02381
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jackson and Quincy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
OSWALD, Jr. v. Oswald
as 2:2026cv02335
Defendant:
Danielle Oswald
Plaintiff:
DAVID F. OSWALD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fleischman v. Watts et al
as 8:2026cv03345
Defendant:
John Does (1-5), The Secretary of the Florida Department of Children and Families, Hughlan Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Benjamin Fleischman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demagistris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02265
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Danielle Demagistris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Higgins v. Forewarn, LLC et al.
as 3:2026cv00398
Defendant:
Forewarn, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Higgins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Larter v. Service Transport Company et al
as 3:2026cv01246
Defendant:
Daniel Salazar and Service Transport Company
Plaintiff:
Shannon Larter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02904
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Parsons v. Trump
as 5:2026ct03334
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Plaintiff:
Danielle Blaine Parsons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14287
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
