Cases 31 - 40 of 351
Thomas v. White et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Thomas
Defendant:
Louis White and David Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams v. Home Depot
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
David Adams
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
ACKERMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ACKERMAN, DAVID ADAMS, LUCIA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Wilson v. W.C.A.D.F. et al
as 1:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
W.C.A.D.F., Dale Santerelli, Bernadette Landeros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Adams, et al v. Palm Beach County
as 21-13825
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ADAMS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MICHAEL SHAW, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and GERALD KASMERE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
PALM BEACH COUNTY
Ruiz et al v. NEI General Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11722
Plaintiff:
Jose C Ruiz, Cruz Eduardo Ruiz and Lukasz Zajkowski
Defendant:
NEI General Contracting, Inc., Delta Drywall and Framing LLC, Josef Rettman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams #462766 v. Robinson et al
as 1:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
David Adams #462766
Defendant:
Marshaun Robinson, Matt MaCauley, Joshua M. Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrantes v. US
as 21-2021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSEPH ABRANTES, DAVID ADAMS, JOSE ACOSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
