Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Matthews v. USA
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
David Matthews
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jaden Turner v. John David Matthews et al
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Jaden Turner
Defendant:
John David Matthews, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06117
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv01858
Plaintiff:
David Matthew Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
BARBOSA v. JERUSALEM FOOD SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv21179
Defendant:
JERUSALEM FOOD SERVICES, INC., JERUSALEM RESTAURANT and DAVID MATTHEW
Plaintiff:
KARLA RIVERA BARBOSA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
