Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Perez et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11605
Plaintiff:
Luciano Perez, Marcello Perez, Marcelo Perez and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Pitts v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv05218
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Arkema Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITT v. MASON et al
as 2:2021cv00834
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and BERNADETTE MASON
Petitioner:
DAVID PITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv16508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pitt v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01401
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
David Pitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slack et al v. London, City of et al
as 4:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Earl V Slack , David Pitts and Cassandra Pitts
Defendant:
London, City of , Edwin Price and Joann Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Pitts
as 3:2016mc00058
Garnishee:
AICPA Insurance Trust, AON Securities, Inc., JPMorgan Investments and USAA IMCO
Defendant:
Michael David Pitts
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
