Cases 1 - 10 of 66,848
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Davis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02164
Plaintiff:
Ralph Davis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaney v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
James Robert Chaney
Defendant:
Branden Davis, Dale Reed, Antonio D Johnson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Harold Davis
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hardymon v. Kent et al.
as 1:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Shane J Hardymon
Defendant:
Scott Kent and Michael P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
