Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Denmon v. Paz
as 26-50603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Art Denmon
Defendant:
Officer FNU Paz and Detective Russell Constable
Denmon v. Rusting et al
as 3:2026cv00012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Denmon
Defendant:
Robert Rusting, Nolen Bass and Antonio Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
100 Crossings Property v. Denmon
as 1:2025cv06613
Plaintiff:
100 Crossings Property doing business as Elevate Greene
Defendant:
Bridgette Denmon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Denmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00279
Plaintiff:
Phillip Scott Denmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Easley v. Stuff et al.
as 3:2025cv01413
Plaintiff:
D. Easley
Defendant:
Jori Anderson-Lee, Kevin Shepard, Major Stuff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DENMON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv11219
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DENMON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC.
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denmon v. FCA US, LLC
as 3:2025cv00284
Plaintiff:
Christin Sue Denmon
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3612
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Denmon v. Paz et al
as 1:2023cv00955
Plaintiff:
Kevin Art Denmon
Defendant:
Officer FNU Paz and Detective Russell Constable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verch v. Denmon Pearlman, P.A.
as 8:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marco Verch
Defendant:
Denmon Pearlman, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
