Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Latika Kaku, et al v. Regal Entertainment Group, et al
as 26-3298
Plaintiff:
LATIKA KAKU and HIRENRAKUMAR KAKU
Defendant:
REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, REGAL CINEMA, ASHLEY MANSFIELD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elgin et al v. Crews et al
as 0:2026cv00132
Executor:
Ashley Elgin
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elgin
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Scott Jordan, Hilarye Dailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Zapata v. Dailey et al
as 2:2026cv02805
Plaintiff:
Nicklos Andrew Zapata
Defendant:
S. Dailey, Jhon Doe, Mrs T. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. The Administrative Office of the New Mexico Courts et al
as 1:2026cv02670
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dailey
Defendant:
The Administrative Office of the New Mexico Courts, Bernalillo County Second Judicial District Court Clerk and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dailey v. United States Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2026cv02589
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dailey
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office, United States Marshals Service, Administrative Offices of the State of New Mexico Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv06187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dailey v. Altec Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv01124
Plaintiff:
Russell Dailey
Defendant:
Altec Industries, Inc. and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Holton v. Dailey
as 8:2026cv01976
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Holton
Defendant:
Trentene Chaise Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
