Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Allen Williams, Jr. v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6478
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALLEN DALE WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director
Williams v. Clarke
as 2:2016cv00139
Petitioner:
Allen Dale Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Debrow v. Caddo Parish Commission et al
as 5:2015cv01717
Plaintiff:
Orlando Mandell Debrow
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Commission, Caddo Correctional Center, Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doty et al
as 7:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Williams
Defendant:
Lawrence Doty, Richard Wathen, Tommy Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale William Lochmiller v. Daniel Paramo et al
as 5:2015cv00061
Petitioner:
Dale William Lochmiller
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and The Attorney General of The State of California Kamila Harris
Williams v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dale Williams
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lorenzo Williams, Sr. v. M. Byrum
as 14-1176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO DALE WILLIAMS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BYRUM, Officer of Hopewell Police Department, S. PAK, Officer at Hopewell Police Department, W. BLANKENSHIP, Officer-Hopewell Police Department and others
Defendant:
RICHARD K. NEWMAN, KENNETH NYE, Judge, ANTHONY SLYVESTER and others
REYNOLDS v. MANZI
as 1:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
DALE WILLIAM REYNOLDS
Defendant:
PAUL MANZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorney's Office
as 4:2013cv01116
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant:
Cullman County District Attorney's Office
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilley v. Cullman County District Attorneys Office
as 4:2013cv00582
Plaintiff:
Dale William Gilley, Jr
Defendant:
Cullman County District Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
