Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Zelesnik v. GE Aircraft Engines et al
as 1:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
GE Aircraft Engines, Rich Jendrix, Lisa Jendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Randolph v. Powercomm Construction, Inc.
as 16-2370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GREGORY RANDOLPH, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANA BROWN, TWANDA BANISTER and others
Plaintiff:
VAN EUBANKS, DAVID PETERSON, JACQUELINE RIDLEY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
POWERCOMM CONSTRUCTION, INC. and DAVID KWASNIK, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brown et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
Dana Brown and Travis Brown
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv14246
Plaintiff:
Dana Brown
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius U.S.A., Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing , Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv13466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abram et al v. Dahill Office Technology Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv02074
Plaintiff:
Michael J Abram and Dana Brown
Defendant:
Dahill Office Technology Corporation and Global Imaging Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv02680
Plaintiff:
DANA BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FERGUSON and JENNIFER BRYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. EQT Production Company
as 5:2011cv00664
Plaintiff:
Dana Browning and Tammy Browning
Defendant:
EQT Production Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Brown v. Artus
as 1:2010cv00395
Petitioner:
Dana Brown
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
