Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Ryte et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Carmela Hawkins, Terry Cagle, Dimitry Perchik and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Reed, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24791
Plaintiff:
Ray Crilley, Victoria Orness, Brad Wade and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Reed, et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2019cv02751
Plaintiff:
Leslie Reed, et al., Ray Crilley, Victoria Orness and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv01579
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv03238
Defendant:
Clayton County Department of Family and Children Services, Investigator Michael Ward, Kevin Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryte et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ryte , Sean Scott , Tonia Arpke and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03763
Plaintiff:
Dana Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH v. LOCAL AT VILLANOVA, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06563
Plaintiff:
LESTER A. WALSH
Defendant:
LOCAL AT VILLANOVA, LLC, LOCAL AT GLEN MILLS, LLC, DANA SMITH FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMITH v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06420
Plaintiff:
DANA SMITH
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
