Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Baldwin v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2026cv04801
Plaintiff: Danny Baldwin
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adams v. WellPath Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv07736
Plaintiff: Danny Adams
Defendant: WellPath Care Medical, Inc., Alameda County, Alden Harken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kadum v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Tucson
as 26-4757
Petitioner: DANNY KADUM
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest: METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and ALDO KADUM
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv09343
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01884
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hudson v. Clarke County et al
as 2:2026cv00106
Plaintiff: Danny Raylee Hudson
Defendant: Clarke County and Austin Cochran
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Harris
as 26-6115
Plaintiff: DANNY DEWANE HOPPER
Defendant: SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Andrews v. Shea et al
as 1:2026cv00898
Plaintiff: Danny Andrews
Defendant: Jacqueline E. Shea, Peter Kies, Simon X. Benito and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
SATZ v. GEIGER et al
as 2:2026cv09295
Plaintiff: ALLEN JEFFREY SATZ
Defendant: JUDGE PETER GEIGER, SGT. BRAD GILMORE, DET. DANNY LIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?