Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Davis v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 4:2012cv00922
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and Linda Berghult
Plaintiff:
Darrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Davis et al v. Harmony Science Academy NW et al
as 4:2012cv03591
Plaintiff:
Darrel Davis and Donna Davis
Defendant:
Harmony Science Academy NW, T Brans, X Brans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Davis
as 7:2012cv02970
Plaintiff:
Harold Phipps
Defendant:
Darrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Davis et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Darrell Davis and Donna Murray
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A., as successor by merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. McCall
as 4:2011cv03263
Petitioner:
Timothy Darrell Davis
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Reeves v. Darrell Davis Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01213
Plaintiff:
Ronald W. Reeves
Defendant:
Darrell Davis Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis v. Workman
as 11-6022
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN DARRELL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shannon Davis v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10589
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHANNON DARRELL DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
