Cases 21 - 30 of 54
DENNY et al v. REAM et al
as 3:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
DAVID DENNY and LONI CARPER
Defendant:
WAYLON REAM and WELLERT TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lomax v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Lomax
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Hager, David Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
General Star Indemnity Company v. Beck et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Defendant:
Adam P. Beck, David Dennis, James F. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Sadler v. Dennis (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Dante Sadler
Defendant:
David Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv03778
Plaintiff:
William Adams , Laverne Arndt , Thomas Barber and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta Crop Protection, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fourstar v. Kane et al
as 4:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Kane, Brian Morris, Donald W. Molloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lester v. Lori Gidley
as 14-2539
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID DENNIS LESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORI GIDLEY
ADAMS et al v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, et al.,
as 3:2014cv06872
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ADAMS , BARBARA ALKIRE , DELBERT L. AMOS and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27130
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Dennis and David Dennis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brannen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:13-cv-01251
Plaintiff:
Isebell Brannen , April Kowalsky , Donna Benedetto and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Gynecare and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
