Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Nigel Parms v. Allegheny County Facility, et al
as 26-2341
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY FACILITY, ZOLLER, DAVID, Inmate Account Property and others
PARMS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY FACILITY et al
as 2:2025cv01895
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY FACILITY, OFFICER ZOLLER, OFFICER DAVID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David English v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv02198
Defendant:
3M Company, DuPont De Nemours Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PS)Katumbusi v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Kathleen Leslie Hrepich, Vander E. Hardy-Porter, Kathleen Leslie Hrepich-Jonas and others
Plaintiff:
Fatima A. Katumbusi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Truly v. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv00783
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Moore, Stephen Duncan, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Clark Truly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Parrilla
as 15-2403
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNDON J. PARRILLA
Interested Party:
WARREN ANGUS, STEPHEN BABIN, ARTHUR BALDWIN and others
ENGLISH v. OWENS et al
as 1:2015cv05941
Plaintiff:
DAVID ENGLISH
Defendant:
DAVID OWENS, MICHELLE GENTEK and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
