Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Beach v. USA
as 2:2019cv00081
Petitioner:
David Richardson Beach
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCLEAN v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00752
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE MCLEAN and ROGER PERRY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., DAVID RICHARDSON, CIEMONE EASTER-ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2018cv05264
Petitioner:
DAVID RICHARDSON
Respondent:
K. BRITTAIN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams et al v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 3:2018cv00952
Plaintiff:
Ivery T Williams, David Richardson, L.C. Richardson and others
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles , Rissie Owens and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Gutierrez
as 1:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
David Richardson
Defendant:
David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scallion v. Richardson et al
as 5:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
Roderick Devar Scallion
Defendant:
David Richardson and Roger L Patty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. USA
as 4:2015cv00049
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Richardson #687060 v. Palmer
as 1:2014cv01250
Petitioner:
Thomas David Richardson #687060
Respondent:
Carmen D. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Craighead County Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
John David Richardson and Charles Bausley
Defendant:
Craighead County Detention Center, Craighead County Circuit Court, Jonesboro Sun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER et al
as 1:2012cv03209
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER, GLOUCESTER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, ROBERT DAMMINGER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
