Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Watson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Watson
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as United States Postal Service and Carolyn Denise Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Green et al v. National Legal Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00938
Plaintiff:
Philipio L. Green, Persephone Green and Denise Bradley
Defendant:
National Legal Laboratories, Inc., Orchid Gene Screen, Life Codes Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McBride v. Amerathon, LLC
as 4:2018cv02546
Defendant:
Amerathon, LLC
Plaintiff:
William McBride, Denise Bradley, Stacy Swoop and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRADLEY v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2017cv04221
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRADLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, N.J. , POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWARK, N.J. and JOHN DOES NO. 1 TO 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Kelly Bradley
as 17-4290
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KELLY DENISE BRADLEY
Jefferson v. Wood et al
as 6:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
L B Jefferson
Defendant:
UP Wood, UP Cook, Denise Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28908
Plaintiff:
Denise Bradley and Julius Shelby
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY v. KELLY et al
as 2:2011cv05183
Plaintiff:
DENISE BRADLEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH KELLY, CAHILL , MURAWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cresencio Molina v. William March, et al
as 09-20730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRESENCIO MOLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM MARCH, CITY OF HOUSTON, KENNETH MAGIDSON and others
Robert Scott, et al v. USA, et al
as 09-5182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Scott and Linda Casoria-Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, IRS Commissioner, Julie Sampiere and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
