Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Darcel Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dixon et al v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01673
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., Harrah's Illinois LLC, Des Plaines Development Limited Partnership and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Emanuel Burgarino and Denise Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv05871
Plaintiff:
RHONDA DENISE DIXON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lubin v. Walton Madden Cooper Robinson Poness, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01276
Plaintiff:
Marty Lubin
Defendant:
Walton Madden Cooper Robinson Poness, Inc. and Kathy Denise Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Dixon
as 17-7010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NIKOLLE DENISE DIXON
Dixon v. James
as 7:2015cv04712
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Sharon James , Shylah James Frazier Special Needs Trust and Syler's Day Care
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dixon v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00578
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Melissa Denise Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Muhammad v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Micheal Chertoff, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
