Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Mitchell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07452
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Mitchell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32076
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Thompson and Garry Thompson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02221
Plaintiff:
Brenda Joyce Jackson , Michael Joseph Jacko , Anthony Demond Jackson and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Timothy Thomas v. Diana Thomas, et al
as 12-4227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY M. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID M. DOUGHERTY, DANIEL DIEHL and KATHY JO WINTERBOTTOM
Defendant:
RONALD WEAGLEY
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
DIANA MARIE THOMAS
George v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie George
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Picerno et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05385
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Picerno and Ernest Joseph Picerno
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hahl v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00791
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Hahl
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Thomas et al
as 1:2011cv02336
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Thomas
Defendant:
Diana Marie Thomas, David M. Dougherty, Daniel Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Motley v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Motley
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hericks v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Hericks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
