Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Kelly v. Director Over the Statewide Protective Unit at McCormick Correctional Institution et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00761
Plaintiff: Albert S Kelly and Albert Santanieyo Kelley
Defendant: Director Over the Statewide Protective Unit at McCormick Correctional Institution, Director Over Security at Headquarters, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stow v. McGrath, et al
as 20-1109
Defendant / Appellee: EDWARD HARDY, Sergeant, NH State Prison, JOHN PERKINS, ROBERT MCGRATH, Prison Unit Manager, NH State Prison and others
Defendant: WILLIAM L. WRENN, Commissioner, NH Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. KENCH, Director of Security and Training, NH Department of Corrections and LYNMARIE C. CUSACK, Assistant Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTON J. STOW
Bruce Koenig v. Department of Public Safety
as 19-7874
Defendant / Appellee: MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISES, J. PHILIP MORGAN, former Warden for WCI, NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Bruce Koenig v. Department of Public Safety
as 19-7875
Defendant / Appellee: STEPHEN T. MOYER, RANDY WATSON, former Commissioner of Correction, MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG
Lonnie Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10825
Defendant / Appellee: BILL VANIER, Individually as Captain of Security at Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions, CHRIS WOODS, Individually as Director of Security, Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions, EDWARD TOWNS, Individually as Clinical Director at Texas Civil Commitment Center for Correct Care Recovery Solutions and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LONNIE KADE WELSH
Jerry Welty, Jr. v. Peter Meletis
as 19-7050
Defendant: AMANDA LAMBERT, Director of Support Services, AUSTIN B. HAYNES, JR., Citizen at Large, PHILLIP CAMPBELL, Assistant fo the County Executive and others
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE HURLOCK, Director of Security, GLENDELL HILL, Chairman and PETER MELETIS, Superintendent
Plaintiff / Appellant: JERRY WELTY, JR.
Elliott Schuchardt v. President United States of Ame, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1366
Defendant / Appellee: DIRECTOR NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY AND CHIEF OF THE CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRECTOR NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ELLIOTT J. SCHUCHARDT, individually and doing business as the Schuchardt Law Firm, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Holloman v. Maine, et al
as 19-1037
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, in his official and individual capacities, BRUCE GELB, Superintendent, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, JEFFREY P. DAIGNEAULT, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant / Appellee: AARON GILL, Sergeant Corrections Officer, Souza Baranowki Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and FRANK MAINE, Correctional Officer, Souza Baranowski Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAJUAN HOLLOMAN
Snyder v. SMCC, et al
as 19-1013
Defendant / Appellee: LYNN BISSONNETTE, Superintendent - MCI Framingham, UNKNOWN OFFICER, with initials D.D., PETER RICE, Inner Perimeter Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOANNA M. SNYDER
Epiphany et al v. Turco et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv12260
Defendant: Massachusetts Partnership for Correctional Healthcare (MPCH), Director of Security, Despina and others
Plaintiff: Mr. Lewis, Bishop Lazarre King Epiphany, Jr and Epiphany Lazaru King Lazarre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?