Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dobbins v. Anderson
as 2:2026cv04212
Petitioner:
Gillian Dobbins
Defendant:
Lisa Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOBBINS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00921
Petitioner:
TAMARA DOBBINS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DOBBINS v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 1:2026cv00572
Plaintiff:
Renada Dobbins
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dobbins et al v. Columbia Sportswear Company et al
as 2:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dobbins and Linda Dobbins
Defendant:
Columbia Sportswear Company and Columbia Sportswear North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
EverCare Choice Inc. v. PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP
as 26-1523
Plaintiff:
EVERCARE CHOICE INC.
Defendant:
PKF O'CONNOR DAVIES, LLP, O'CONNOR DAVIES, LLP, O'CONNOR DAVIES MUNNS & DOBBINS, LLP and others
Washington v. Lacey, et al.
as 26-2977
Plaintiff:
RODERICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
JACKIE LACEY, SHEN JAY FERN, ROBERT JACKSON and others
Lanham, Jr. v. Batchelor et al
as 2:2026cv00527
Plaintiff:
Darrel Lanham, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert J Batchelor, James R Skelton, Krista Stoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falcone et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03557
Plaintiff:
Jules Falcone, Anthony Mott, Brandon Wilkins and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dobbins v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2026cv00490
Plaintiff:
Cherlyn Dobbins
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Pretrial Service:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
