Cases 1 - 10 of 53,288
Runkle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02344
Plaintiff:
Donald Runkle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Bryant v. Trump et al
as 5:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Nicolle S. Bryant
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brown v. Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11247
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
Commonwealth Care Alliance, Inc., Dominique Moss and Rosemary Jackson
Winnett v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Donald F Winnett
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gadow et al v. Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Glenda Gadow and Donald Gadow, Sr.
Defendant:
Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home, Okolona Mississippi Endowment Foundation of the Shearer and Richardson Families doing business as Shearer-Richardson Memorial Nursing Home and Chickasaw County Board of Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maines v. Alexander et al
as 6:2024cv02941
Plaintiff:
Donald L Maines, Jr
Defendant:
Terry Alexander and Oakland Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
