Cases 11 - 20 of 53
ORNDORF v. FYE et al
as 3:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
CARLA ORNDORF
Defendant:
SHAWN FYE, AUSTIN MILLER, DOUGLAS CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banerian et al v. Benson et al
as 1:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michael Banerian, Peter Colovos, William Gordon and others
Defendant:
Jocelyn Benson, Douglas Clark, Juanita Curry and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Joan Swartz McKay, Grace Huizinga, Samantha Neuhaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Running Bird v. Mertens-Jones et al
as 4:2021cv04197
Plaintiff:
Harold Running Bird
Defendant:
Tammy Mertens-Jones, Douglas Clark, Timothy Reisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Neill et al
as 4:2021cv04196
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Defendant:
Jeff Neill, Darin Young, Douglas Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21915
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Douglas Clark, III v. W.L. Montgomery
as 5:2020cv01529
Respondent:
W.L. Montgomery
Petitioner:
Robert Douglas Clark, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tanner Properties Inc. v. Clark
as 1:2020cv02456
Plaintiff:
Tanner Properties Inc.
Defendant:
Roderick Douglas Clark, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38864
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
