Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Gardner v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Khashir Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY, Deputy Commissioner TERRANCE CLARK, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ford v. Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ford
Defendant:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ford v. Calipatria State Prison et al
as 2:2021cv08723
Plaintiff:
Marcel Douglas Ford
Defendant:
Calipatria State Prison, State of California, Lieutenant Cowey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mount v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jordan Mount
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Michael Morris, Justin Howalt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
W v. City of Clovis Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Brent Aguilar, City of Clovis Police Department and Douglas Ford
Plaintiff:
I W
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05274
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucero v. City of Clovis Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00445
Defendant:
Brent Aguilar, City of Clovis Police Department, Douglas Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Lucero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01669
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06178
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS FORD BANKS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
