Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Taylor v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv02351
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Taylor
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Rowland v. Adams, et al
as 24-4008
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR ROWLAND, JR.
Defendant:
R. ADAMS, Officer, FNU WEBB, Officer, B. EGBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Watson v. Newman, et al.
as 3:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Donna H. Watson
Defendant:
Richard Keith Newman, Lieutenant Jacquita Rachelle Allen, John F. Keohane, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. Andresen et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Taylor Rowland, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Andresen and FNU McMurphy
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53481
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DWAYNE TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11723
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rowland v. State of Utah
as 4:2019cv00100
Defendant:
State of Utah
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Dwayne Taylor Rowland, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor #142284 v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv05154
Defendant:
W Davis, E Titla, A Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Dwayne Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Cache County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Cache County Sheriff's Office
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Taylor Rowland, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
