Cases 1 - 10 of 3,357
Sharplin v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC, Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, LLC, Eagle, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Horace Sharplin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Blansett v. ABB INC. et al
as 1:2023cv24586
Defendant:
ABB INC., CBS CORPORATION, FLOWSERVE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BLANSETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Boyce A. Stringer et al v. American Biltrite, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv09813
Defendant:
DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS, INC., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to, and formerly known as DOMCO INC., FLOOR PRODUCTS (TEXAS), AZROCK INDUSTRIES INC., UVALDE ROCK ASPHALT COMPANY, REDCO CORPORATION, formerly known as CRANE CO., Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to COCHRANE CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Boyce Stringer, Nancy Stringer, Boyce A. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Oswald et al v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2023cv01074
Defendant:
Domco Products Texas, Inc., Honeywell International, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Cross Defendant:
Redco Corp, Judith Oswald, Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodrich Corporation, H.M. Royal, Inc. and IMO Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edwin Oswald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Love et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Leonard D. Love and Karen L. Morey
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, Robinson Insulation Company, Grogan Robinson Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
VAUGHAN et al v. AT&T CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00340
Defendant:
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AT&T CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VAUGHAN, SR. and CANDACE VAUGHAN
Interested Party:
ABB, Inc. and ABB INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
McGinnis v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Bonnie McGinnis
Defendant:
Akebono Brake Corporation, ArvinMeritor, Inc., BWDAC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOWARD v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
MARTIN M. HOWARD
Cross Claimant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CORNING, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Defendant:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, CRANE COMPANY, EATON CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, GTE OPERATIONS SUPPORT, INC., THE OKONITE COMPANY and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
MIGHTY AUTO PARTS and MIGHTY AUTO PARTS WESTERN NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Wright et al v. Cummins Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10496
Plaintiff:
Bruce S Wright and Louise K Wright
Cross Claimant:
Cummins Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., IMO Industries Inc. and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Cameron International Corporation f/k/a Cooper Cameron Corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to The Cooper-Bessemer Corporation, Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
General Electric Company, ITT LLC, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VOLLMAN v. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2022cv02564
Plaintiff:
GREG VOLLMAN
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., AURORA PUMP COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
Advanced Thermal Hydronics, LLC, AMERICAN PREMIER UNDERWRITERS, BURNHAM, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, FOSTER -WHEELER LLC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
