Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Stokes v. Lowe et al
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Defendant:
Timothy T Lowe and Bonanza Produce Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Stokes v. Darlington County Detention Center
as 4:2023cv06378
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Defendant:
Darlington County Detention Center, James Hudson, Kelly Philbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STOKES et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MALLORY STOKES, ERIC STOKES, HOLLY STOKES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Mirror Finish PDR, LLC et al v. Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00440
Plaintiff:
Huff Wesley and Mirror Finish PDR, LLC
Defendant:
Eric Stokes, Cosmetic Car Company Holdings, Inc., Cosmetic Car Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes #065373 v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04624
Plaintiff:
William Eric Stokes, Sr.
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. United States of America
as 6:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
Eric Stokes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stokes v. Lee
as 2:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Defendant:
Devin Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Ness & Campbell Crane, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01198
Defendant:
Patrick Brunson, Ness & Campbell Crane, Inc. and Daniel Puckett
Plaintiff:
Eric Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stokes v. Warden
as 8:2014cv04288
Petitioner:
Eric Stokes
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Estill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
