Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
EVELYN LEE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv16613
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lee
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28636
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lee
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spooner v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2012cv02612
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lee Spooner
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Phoenix Police Department , Toni Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Evelyn Lee v. Goldline International, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01495
Defendant:
Does and Goldline International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lee
Unknown:
Thomas J Meena
Evelyn Lee, et al. v. Ac And S, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83954
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Lee
Defendant:
Ac And S, Inc
PEARROW et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv83974
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN JEAN PEARROW, CAROLYN JEAN PEARROW, EVELYN LEE and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LEE et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv83954
Plaintiff:
STANLEY RAYMON LEE, STANLEY RAYMON LEE, EVELYN LEE and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
