Cases 11 - 20 of 63
WEST v. GIBBONS et al
as 3:2020cv00055
Defendant:
GIBBONS, SERGEANT Daniel Greene, CERT OFFICER Danzy and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Lewis West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucey v. Paucek et al
as 1:2020cv02424
Defendant:
Coretha M. Rushing, Edward S. Macias, Harsha Mokkarala and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lacey and Thomas Lucey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
WEST v. GIBBONS et al
as 5:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
EARL LEWIS WEST
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN GIBBONS, SERGEANT DANIEL GREENE, SERGEANT JOHN WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04142
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Penny Lewis and James Earl Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Davis
as 4:2020cv02110
Petitioner:
James Earl Lewis
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Theis v. Christopher J. Paucek et al
as 1:2020cv03360
Defendant:
Timothy M Haley, Edward S Macias, Catherine A. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Theis
Nominal Defendant:
2U, Inc.
In Re 2U, Inc. Securities Class Action
as 8:2019cv03455
Petitioner:
Employees' Retirement System of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DeKalb County Pension Fund, Herbert Saunders and others
Respondent:
Catherine A. Graham, 2U, Inc. and Christopher J. Paucek
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City Employee Retirement System
Defendant:
Harsha Mokkarala, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Emerson College
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Lewis v. UTMB Medical Staff
as 2:2019cv00223
Plaintiff:
Damon Earl Lewis
Defendant:
UTMB Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Lewis v. McConnell Unit, et al
as 18-40233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON EARL LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MCCONNELL UNIT, NANCY TREVINO and JENNIFER SMITH
Lewis v. Kelley
as 5:2017cv00208
Plaintiff:
Don Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
