Cases 21 - 30 of 882
Mack v. Studdard et al
as 4:2024cv04002
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Cornelius Mack and Mal
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Studdard, Sheriff Wayne Easley, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. USA
as 3:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
DEMONTE EASLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fowler v. Easley et al
as 3:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fowler
Defendant:
Officer Easley, Officer Brown, Officer Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Donald Brooks
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Ann-Marie Easley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GG Insurance Services Incorporated v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
GG Insurance Services Incorporated
Defendant:
Myles Johnson, Unknown Johnson, John J Kresevic and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Easley v. Waters et al
as 3:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
William Easley
Defendant:
Waters, Ryan Hughes and D. Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Easley et al
as 4:2023cv04086
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Harris
Defendant:
Sheriff Wayne Easley, Brandon Yeley, Mason Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal - Civil Rights
Easley v. Nolan et al
as 3:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Aaron J. Nolan, Robia Jones-Barringer, Lucas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Easley v. Wal-Mart Store Texas, LLC
as 3:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Robyn Easley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Store Texas, LLC and Wal-Mart Store Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
