Cases 41 - 50 of 647
USA v. Christopher Easterling
as 23-1143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. EASTERLING
EASTERLING v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Aaron Goines v. TitleMax of Virginia, Inc.
as 22-2005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AARON GOINES, ALICIA ADAMS, AMANDA ALCOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. and TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
Defendant:
TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
EASTERLING v. MIAMI VALLEY REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASTERLING
Defendant:
MIAMI VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Consipracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Billingsley v. Carter et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Billingsley
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Easterling Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Easterling v. US Bank National Association
as 3:2022cv01916
Plaintiff:
Ken Easterling
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Easterling v. DeWine et al
as 3:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Mike DeWine and Thomas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Easterling, r v. Afzal et al
as 3:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Warren Easterling, r
Defendant:
Kamron Afzal, Thomas Hagel and Carl Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davidson v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Kevin DePaul Davidson
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Kendrick Boyd and Karen Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
