Cases 41 - 50 of 80,572
KING v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEO KING, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Robert Frazier v. Prince Georges County
as 24-1380
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Edward Wilson v. Ramsey County, et al
as 24-1902
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilson
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Medical Department and Department of Justice
Edward Wilson v. Ramsey County ADC
as 24-1908
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilson
Defendant:
Ramsey County Adult Detention Center, ADC Jail
MOSS v. MOSS et al
as 2:2024cv05753
Defendant:
JEANNE E MOSS, JEANNE E JEFFERSON, NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MOSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Kroger
as 24-20182
Plaintiff:
Ryan Edward Miller
Defendant:
Kroger Company and Kroger Texas, L.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Corbett v. City Of Rockport et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Edward Manual Corbett
Defendant:
City Of Rockport, Aransas County and Mayor Jaroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
