Cases 1 - 10 of 29
USA v. Eric Vaughn
as 24-5090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC VAUGHN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Gooch v. Vaughn et al
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sherrick Jamar Gooch
Defendant:
Eric Vaughn, Mason Barnes and Mark Thurmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vodicka v. Ermatinger
as 22-10478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian E. Vodicka and Steven B. Aubrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert L. Ermatinger, Jr., Scott Robert Sayers, Does 1-20, all whose true names are unknown and others
Goostree v. County of Simpson, KY et al
as 1:2021cv00059
Defendant:
County of Simpson, KY, Jailer Eric Vaughn and Deputy Justin Hutton
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shawn Goostree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv01452
Plaintiff:
Eric Vaughn Howard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Breece v. State of Oregon
as 2:2019cv00866
Petitioner:
Eric Vaughn Breece
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITY OF CHARLESTOWN, INDIANA et al
as 4:2019cv00047
Defendant:
GREGORY DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, BROWN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC, CHARLESTOWN BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aubrey et al v. D Magazine Partners LP et al
as 3:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Scott Robert Sayers, Does 1-20, City of Dallas and others
Plaintiff:
Steven B Aubrey and Brian E Vodicka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughn v. Cook Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv08136
Plaintiff:
Eric Vaughn
Defendant:
Cook Co. Sheriff Dept. and Correctional Officer Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
