Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Ward v. Hungland et al
as 0:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone F. Ward
Defendant:
Clay Hungland and Jammie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Beto v. Kimberley Barkley, et al
as 16-1397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL BETO
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD SECRETARY KIMBERLEY A. BARKLEY, BOARD SECRETARY BUSHEY CONWAY W., INTERSTATE DIRECTOR MARLIN FOULDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1200
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WARD v. CAMERON
as 5:2015cv03703
Petitioner:
JAMES F. WARD
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Minnesota Security Hospital et al
as 0:2015cv02593
Plaintiff:
Tyrone F. Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Minnesota Security Hospital, Clay Haglund and Jamie Niesen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETO v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2014cv02522
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BETO
Defendant:
KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, W. CONWAY BUSHEY, MARLIN F. FOULDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 1:2013cv08403
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Ward
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Chrysler Group LLC
as 2:2013cv01904
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Ward
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17401
Plaintiff:
Alice F. Ward
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward, Jr. v. Commissioner of SSA
as 5:2013cv00674
Plaintiff:
Thomas F Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
